When the Lebanese government in the era of former President Michel Suleiman came out with the equation «self-distancing» in light of fierce battles in the area, it seemed like a rosy dream of a man drowning in his slumber while the fires have devoured his neighbors' houses, and touched the windows of his bedroom. «An equation from the outside of time and place» as one of the biggest belongers to the group of « defiance » describes it.

 

In a time of the renewed «conflict of arises» between the United States and the «NATO» on one hand, and the Russian Federation under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin, on the other hand, the division in the region and with it the world appeared as the inevitable predestination, and the States and regional powers including big parties should hunker down behind a one of the axises' «Barrack», rather being run over under the feet of «legions» that not concerned with maps and borders, as happened with some of the components and social strata in Iraq and Syria.

 

The «Baabda's statement», seemed more like a «Cliché» that does not prevent the hunger, according to the reluctant reference.

In spite of the hunkering down and the grinding war between the combatants, that did not prevent some political violations-like cold whiffs on the sidelines of the heat of battles, which Putin pushed towards it, taking advantage of his differentiation in the Yemen war, as a rear conduit to a warm relations with the Arab Gulf states in the heart of the extreme hot Syrian war.

 

But the basic credit in some political cooling due to the monster called «Daash» which began biting in the influence maps of both axes states , so the popular proverb certify them which is «The catastrophe brings us together.»

 

Once it has cooled between the axises and everyone touch for the first time the seriousness in a political solution for the Syrian war, the first engagement title, a new title of the conflict stuck his head from where some ones did not count ... «Nagorno Karabakh» ... a new dish on the conflict table but in a different flavor for its predecessor!

 

The battles that erupted on the border of «Nagorno Karabakh» territory at the end of last week between Azerbaijani and Armenian troops in the updated version of conflicts between the two countries since the nineties of the past century , landed on the combatants in the two «axises» and their audience from outside the confessional literature.

 

How not and «Abu Ali Putin», as some «defiant» like to name him, had been hit by the Azerbaijan flames (Shiite sectarian identity) in his chest, which defended it the Islamic Republic of Iran that found in the Christians of Armenia an owners of right in the face of the «Erdogan and NATO's Shiites» as a reference reluctant describes them.

 

And If the voice of the «Dashnaktsutyun» party is top announcer of the pain of Armenians and their sufferings in Lebanon, whether by statements or political positions, in a meeting of the positions and the literature of the Armenian President Serzh Sarkisian, the voices of the «resistance and defiance» team seemed lower but at the same content, and in the development and raise the pace framework , either through their media, which some of them sent professional teams to cover the war in «Nagorno Karabakh» from the Armenian corner, of course, or on political platforms and in the context of popular mobilization.

 

And how not the voice of "defiant" override and battle there is a chance to say with the overwhelming evidence that the conflict in its essence is not sectarian, by evidenced that "Jaafarian Iran" stands in the face of "Azerbaijan Shiite" supported by the «Islamic brotherhood» of the Turkish President "Recep Tayyip Erdogan".

 

In addition, if a former leader in the «Hezbollah» disgraces how the resistance and Iran stood beside «Shiites murderers» as he said, the «Hezbollah» Community sees the situation the best proof of that its going to Syria and Iraq came in a standard outside the confessional constraint and purely political dimension.

 

The attitude of Iran and "Hezbollah" seemed to biased to Armenia, the Syrian position was more outspoken and involved in the face of Azerbaijan because of things takes long time to count. It is enough for the government of President Bashar al-Assad's to see the support of Erdogan to the Azerbaijani forces to stand in the Armenian side, which gathered with it by more than excellent popular and political relationship.

 

A Syrian source recalls the Official visit by the head of the Syrian People's Assembly Mohammad Jihad al-Laham last year to Armenia and delivering a speech on the «Genocide Celsius », which was accompanied by Syrian official media with huge call up and effort.

 

Moreover, based on that, the battle in the «Nagorno-Karabakh» region between Armenian and Azerbaijani troops seems clear-cut and with Armenian flavored, in the "coalition of defiance" eyes, who see it as a stab of Erdogan and «NATO» in the side of Putin.

 

Will «Hezbollah» go to the fight in Armenia against Azerbaijan if necessary?

ِA "Hezbollah" community answers recalling the words of its Secretary General "Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah"، «We will be where we should be».